How to write a book review?
A review is a critical essay, written review, which contains a concise analysis and evaluation of a literary work by the reviewer. How to write a book review? The reviewer must be aware that his task is to assess the advantages and disadvantages of a literary work, and this requires high professionalism from himself. Objectivity and fairness in evaluations is very important for the review. Reviews are divided into the following types:
- short book review (article)
- auto review
- review (review).
Book Review: Plan
- A description of the bibliographic nature (title, author, year of release), as well as a brief (one or two sentences) retelling of the content of the work.
- Response impression (direct review).
- Comprehensive analysis or critical analysis of the text: analysis of the name, analysis of the content and form, the specifics of the composition, the author's skill in displaying the characters, features of the individual style of the writer.
- Justified evaluation of the text and the personal conclusions of the author of the review: the main conclusion of the reviewer, the relevance of the work.
How to write a book review: tips
The review examines the quality of the work written by the author: the correspondence of the characters and the author’s speech to the genre of the work, the interesting plot. In particular, attention is drawn to the uniformity of presentation throughout the entire text, which can be fun, educational or instructive. Grammatical errors, as well as artistic discoveries and the successes of the author, are certainly noted, and the first and second stimulates the author to work on himself and on subsequent works. It is allowed to reflect the individual feelings of the reviewer, inspired by the work. Thoughts and conclusions should be stated reasonably and in detail. Inherent comments like “Great!” Or “I love!” Are not suitable for review. Calling for strife and violence and profanity is also unacceptable for review.
Errors in writing a review
These include the substitution of the analysis of a work by its retelling, recall, or commentary; Familiar appeal to the author, lack of argumentation.Sometimes inexperienced reviewers “originate” to the detriment of the logic and content of the work, forget to emphasize their position, overload the review with minor details. No less common mistake is the dominance in the review of the ideological and thematic features of the work to the detriment of the aesthetic component of the text. An example of a book review that can be used as a sample is located along.